Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo an initial editorial screening to assess relevance to the journal scope, originality, structure, ethical compliance, and basic scholarly quality.
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to qualified reviewers. The peer review process ensures that published articles meet academic standards in terms of theoretical contribution, methodological rigor, analytical quality, and clarity of presentation.
Review Criteria
- Relevance to the journal focus and scope.
- Originality and contribution to knowledge.
- Clarity of research problem and objectives.
- Soundness of methodology.
- Quality of analysis and discussion.
- Appropriateness of references and scholarly engagement.
- Compliance with publication ethics.
Editorial Decision
Editorial decisions may include acceptance, minor revision, major revision, rejection, or resubmission after substantial improvement. The final decision is made by the editor based on reviewer recommendations and editorial assessment.